The United States holds the first position globally in sending missionaries, with over 140,000 missionaries serving around the world. This immense outreach is supported by a robust infrastructure of well-established mission organizations and financial backing from churches and donors with substantial economic resources. For centuries, missionary work has been deeply integrated into Protestant and Evangelical churches across the country.
Brazil, while smaller in scale, holds the second position globally, sending approximately 35,000 missionaries abroad.
The missionary work of the United States and Brazil reveals distinct approaches, shaped by their unique contexts and histories. Here’s an insightful breakdown of the differences, challenges, and positive aspects of missionary sending from both countries:
Difference in Missionary Sending: United States vs. Brazil
The sending of missionaries by the United States and Brazil reflects the unique characteristics and contexts of each country. Below is an overview of the differences, challenges, and positive aspects:
1. Missionary Sending
• United States:
- Sends more than 140,000 missionaries globally.
- Has a well-established missionary infrastructure, with large and structured organizations (e.g., IMB, YWAM).
- Strong financial support comes from churches, organizations, and donors with significant economic capacity.
- The missionary vision has been integrated into Protestant and Evangelical churches for centuries.
• Brazil
- Sends about *35,000 missionaries* abroad, with this number growing due to the increase of the Evangelical movement in the country.
- Many missions are organized by small local churches or national agencies like AMTB and YWAM.
- Financial support remains a challenge, as most missionaries rely on multiple individual donors or small church contributions.
2. Challenges Faced*
• United States
- *Cultural adaptation*: American missionaries often face difficulties in understanding the cultures of poorer or less evangelized countries.
- *Dependence on mission finances*: High operational costs can be a barrier in certain regions.
• Brazil
- Limited funding: Brazil’s economic situation and financial support model make sustaining missionaries in the field difficult.
- Developing missionary infrastructure: Although growing, there is still a lack of organizations with global reach and significant mobilization capacity.
- Cultural and linguistic preparation: Brazilian missionaries often struggle to obtain adequate training before deployment.
3. Positive Aspects
• United States
- Abundant resources enable greater reach and impact.
- Well-organized missions with long-term support for missionaries.
- Presence in virtually every country worldwide.
• Brazil:
- Cultural flexibility: Brazilians adapt easily to diverse cultures, especially in the Global South.
- Exponential growth: The missionary vision in Brazil is rapidly expanding, with increasing involvement of local churches.
- Passion and commitment: Brazilian missionaries are recognized for their dedication, even with limited resources.
American missionaries lead in numbers and resources due to a long missionary tradition and robust financial support. Meanwhile, Brazil, even with fewer resources, demonstrates vibrant growth marked by cultural flexibility and increasing passion for missionary work. For Brazilian missionaries to overcome financial and structural challenges, it is crucial for local churches to invest more in training, mobilization, and the maintenance of missionaries.
Scroll down to support our mission and make a donation today
Comments